Fox News’ Tucker Carlson has always been one of Donald Trump’s biggest defenders in the media.
It’s the reason why the Left has been trying to cancel Tucker Carlson for the past four years.
But jaws dropped when Tucker Carlson exposed the outright hypocrisy of those calling on Fox News to fire him.
During a recent interview with Fake News CNN, Anti-Defamation League CEO Jonathan Greenblatt demanded that Fox News fire Tucker Carlson based on a bunch of lies and smears.
According to Greenbalt, Carlson promoted a “white replacement” conspiracy theory by simply saying that Democrats support amnesty in hopes of importing a new electorate.
But Carlson set the record straight during a recent episode, explaining how his show focused solely on how immigration affected voting and had nothing to do with race.
“No, no, no. This is a voting rights question. I have less political power because they are importing a brand new electorate, why should I sit back and take that? The power that I have as an American guaranteed at birth is one man one vote and they’re diluting it,” Carlson stated.
But he didn’t stop there.
Carlson went on to expose the ADL’s hypocrisy by pointing to an essay on their website about how a “bi-national state” including Israelis and Palestinians would end the idea of Israel as a Jewish state because of high Palestinian birth rates and immigration would render the Jewish people a minority in Israel.
The essay read:
A bi-national state, in principle and in practice, would mean the ideological end of the Jewish State of Israel and lead to the forsaking of Jewish nationalism and identity, along with its special status as a refuge for Jews fleeing persecution.
Furthermore, bi-nationalism is unworkable given current realities and historic animosities. With historically high birth rates among the Palestinians, and a possible influx of Palestinian refugees and their descendants now living around the world, Jews would quickly be a minority within a bi-national state, thus likely ending any semblance of equal representation and protections. In this situation, the Jewish population would be increasingly politically – and potentially physically – vulnerable.
Of course, Carlson’s sentiment was no different than that of the ADL in the essay above.
The only difference is that Tucker Carlson is a conservative.