Kamala Harris thought she walked away with the election in her pocket.
But it looks as though she began her celebration far too soon.
And Kamala Harris just got broadsided by this bad news immediately after stepping off the stage.
Undecided voters left on the table
According to a snap CNN poll following the debate, 63 percent of those who tuned into the debate thought that Kamala Harris won the event, with 37 percent thinking Donald Trump was victorious.
But it seems as though that number is actually nothing more than some fool’s gold.
Winning the debate does not equate to winning over voters for election day.
And it turns out that those Americans who claimed Kamala won the debate on style also harbor disdain for Trump’s aggressive debate form.
David Muir, who moderated the debate, also falsely fact-checked Trump on the already proven truth that Democrats support allowing babies to die on the table if they survive a failed abortion.
Many Americans believe that Muir’s lie contributed to the belief Kamala won the debate, as viewers that tuned into the debate that are not as well versed on the set up of the debate likely trusted that a moderator would not deliberately lie as openly as Muir did.
And the proof was clear once the media began speaking to undecided voters.
Reuters hosted a focus group that determined that undecided voters almost decisively backed Trump following the debate.
According to their report, Reuters “interviewed 10 people who were still unsure how they were going to vote in the Nov. 5 election before they watched the debate.”
“Six said afterward they would now either vote for Trump or were leaning toward backing him,” continued the report. “Three said they would now back Harris and one was still unsure how he would vote.”
New York Times admits Kamala Harris failed to do her job
The New York TImes ultimately published a story in which the headline wrote, “Pundits Said Harris Won the Debate. Undecided Voters Weren’t So Sure,” which detailed major red flags for Kamala’s campaign.
In swing states, voters argued that either Kamala Harris couldn’t sell them on joining her side, or that they had already decided their support for Trump.
“She still has to impress me,” a 19-year-old sophomore at the University of Wisconsin-Madison told a reporter from The Times.
“I’m still deciding,” she added, arguing that she needed more from Kamala on inflation and housing costs first.
In Las Vegas, The Times Geral Mayes, 40, who explained that “he felt both candidates failed to connect their campaign promises to his family’s budget,” while adding that “he came away confused.”
Meanwhile, 34-year-old Keilah Miller in Wisconsin said her support moved behind Trump following the debate.
“Trump’s pitch was a little more convincing than hers,” Miller argued. “I guess I’m leaning more on his facts than her vision.”
Miller also added that her life was significantly better when Trump was President.
“When Trump was in office – not going to lie – I was living way better,” she stated. “I’ve never been so down as in the past four years.”
“It’s been so hard for me,” she concluded.
Jason Henderson, a defense contractor in Arizona, also argued that he supported Trump more after the debate.
“Trump had the more commanding presentation,” Henderson declared. “There was nothing done by Harris that made me think she’s better. In any way.”
The fake news media is working overtime to try and paint a picture that Kamala Harris was clearly the better candidate, and that she had destroyed Donald Trump in the debate.
But they are quickly learning that Americans are telling a completely different story overall.