Democrats are still giddy over what they got away with in 2020.
But those laughs turned to shrieks of panic.
Because this stunning jail sentence has Democrats entering full-blown panic over their party’s fate in 2024.
Democrats have long contended that voter fraud doesn’t exist and is merely a figment of Americans’ imaginations.
They’ve even claimed there’s no point in looking into voter fraud allegations because, again, voter fraud doesn’t exist.
But suddenly Democrats are in panic mode after the sentence that prosecutors in an Arizona voter fraud case have asked.
The 2020 Presidential election was one of the most unprecedented elections in American history, thanks to the restrictions politicians implemented in their overreaction to COVID.
Mass mail-in voting and ballot harvesting schemes were hatched up all across the country in the name of “public safety,” but ultimately, they predictably only resulted in making voter fraud an issue.
And no state in the country may have had more allegations and debates over voter fraud, and its impact on the election, than Arizona.
Voter fraud allegations poured in from all over the state, leading Republicans to attempt to investigate the claims, while Democrats resorted to lawsuits to prevent any legitimate investigations from taking place.
But while many voter fraud allegations went uninvestigated thanks to all the noise and political nonsense from the Left, some investigations were able to move forward, and their results have Democrats running scared.
Chief among them has been the investigation into allegations that former San Luis Democrat Mayor and current school board member, Guillermina Fuentes, and Alma Juarez, operated an illegal ballot harvesting operation.
And now, authorities in Arizona have revealed that after investigating the case, they are pursuing up to a one-year prison sentence for Fuentes.
“Authorities say Fuentes and Juarez participated in ‘ballot harvesting,’” The Washington Post reported. “That’s a practice once used by both political parties to boost turnout but was made illegal by a 2016 state law that barred anyone but a family member or caregiver from returning early ballots for another person. It’s the only case filed so far by the state attorney general under the law, which the U.S. Supreme Court upheld last year.”
But to say that Fuentes and Juarez simply “participated” in illegal ballot harvesting would be a massive understatement.
According to reports, the two Democrats ran a “sophisticated” operation that used Fuentes position in Democrat circles to convince voters to trust her to collect, and even fill out, their ballot for them.
Obviously, the operation allegedly run by Fuentes and Juarez wouldn’t have been capable of changing the outcome of Arizona’s Presidential election, which Joe Biden won by roughly 10,000 votes.
But there’s no doubt that Democrats’ efforts to expand mail-in voting and ballot harvesting in the lead up to the 2020 election was pivotal in giving Joe Biden the win.
And this case simply proves not only that voter fraud does, in fact, exist and was a factor in the election, but also that when authorities are allowed to investigate voter fraud allegations, they tend to find more voter fraud than was expected.
Of course, that’s nothing new, though.
It has been known for years that mail-in voting and ballot harvesting open up the voting process to fraud, and invite criminals to break the law far more than traditional, in-person voting.
Even former Democrat President Jimmy Carter admitted in a 2005 report he wrote on voter fraud that, “Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud.”
The American people are picking up on this fact, even if Democrats aren’t.
And with their fellow Democrats finally starting to go to jail for their voter fraud schemes, there’s no doubt the entire Party is in a full on panic mode over the 2022 Midterms.
Political Animal News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.
