Adam Schiff is about to get his entire career rocked by the Supreme Court

Adam Schiff has remained unrelenting in his campaign to try and destroy the Constitution.

But it looks as though he bit off more than he could chew.

Now, Adam Schiff is about to get his entire career rocked by the Supreme Court.

Adam Schiff’s next attack on the Supreme Court

Right now, the easiest way to manufacture more credibility on the Left is by levying attacks against the Supreme Court.

Since the Democrats no longer control the Supreme Court, they are hoping to destroy it.

President Joe Biden has gone as far as proposing a term limit scheme that would immediately remove Justices John Roberts, Samuel Alito, and Clarence Thomas from the bench.

Representative Adam Schiff (D-CA) has even come up with his own angle of attack against the Court to bolster the Left’s ongoing war with the Judiciary.

Schiff recently proposed a bill titled the “Judicial FOIA Expansion Act,” which would effectively allow the public to access all private communications made by a Supreme Court Justice.

“Increasing transparency within the judiciary is a crucial step towards restoring the people’s trust in our justice system,” Schiff argued.

“My Judicial FOIA Expansion Act will provide the American people greater insight into the inner workings of courts by providing public and journalistic access to the Judiciary’s administrative records,” he added. “This reform and others are increasingly necessary to begin to restore faith in our judicial branch.”

However, the biggest problem with Schiff’s new bill is that its constitutionality – or lack thereof – is extremely questionable.

If the Supreme Court gets the opportunity to review a simple case regarding Schiff’s bill, the Court will strike it down immediately due to its violation of the separation of power.

In a recent interview with Newsweek, New York University Professor of Law Stephen Gillers explained what that would look like.

“On one hand, the Court, which is the final arbiter of such things, might look on Schiff’s bill as a violation of the constitutional separation of powers, at least to the extent it would, in the Court’s view, interfere with the Court’s deliberations,” explained Gillers.

Why the Supreme Court could uphold Schiff’s bill

The Democrats have a strong history of successfully strong-arming conservative justices to uphold their insanely unconstitutional power grabs.

One example is when former President Barack Obama bullied John Roberts in order to switch his vote in order to ram Obamacare through the Court.

Democrats would mobilize their soldiers in the media to levy brutal attacks against the legitimacy of the Supreme Court while amplifying phony scandals manufactured by the Left – particularly around Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas.

Gillers suggested that the Court may uphold this proposal as a way to appease their critics who are engineering the narrative that some legitimacy crisis is taking place.

“The Court’s reputation is justifiably suffering now. It must be receptive to the public’s desire for confidence in its work,” Gillers argued.

“It must avoid what is easily, and at times fairly, seen as a knee jerk, even an arrogant, dismissal of the public interest,” the professor concluded.

The problem is the fact that there is no real crisis about the legitimacy of the Court.

The only lack of trust that exists belongs to Democrats, who are just angry that they are not winning every case that they want.

The true purpose of this bill is to open the door into the privacy of Supreme Court Justices to fake news media.

The left-wing media would, effectively, be able to spy on the conservative justices, only to manufacture some more completely invented scandals, which is inevitably followed by calls that the conservatives on the Court should step aside in the cases the Left might lose.