Three Key Takeaways:
- Pam Bondi warned that activist judges, mainly appointed under Obama and Biden, are using temporary restraining orders to block Trump’s policies, creating what she calls a “judicial junta” that undermines presidential authority.
- Specific judges were accused of partisan overreach, including ordering deportation planes to turn back midair and blocking executive orders based on political reasoning rather than legal grounds.
- In response, Republicans are considering impeachment and legislative actions to rein in judicial power, while Bondi expressed confidence that the Supreme Court will ultimately uphold the separation of powers.
Attorney General Pam Bondi has uncovered something terrifying about our nation’s security.
The establishment elites never wanted this information to reach the public.
And Pam Bondi revealed one chilling truth that left Washington insiders speechless.
Trump administration Attorney General Pam Bondi exposed one shocking plan that would let rogue judges rule America with an iron fist.
President Trump is battling the Washington establishment to drain the Swamp.
But now an insurgent group of judicial activists stands in his way.
Judicial power grab threatens American democracy
President Trump recently sounded the alarm about a group of unelected judges who are systematically attempting to seize power from the executive branch using temporary restraining orders and nationwide injunctions.
These activist judges, primarily appointed by Barack Obama and Joe Biden, have weaponized their positions to block Trump administration policies at an unprecedented rate.
In just the first few months of his second term, Trump has faced more judicial roadblocks than Joe Biden encountered in his entire presidency.
The numbers tell a shocking story. Two-thirds of all injunctions issued against a President this century have targeted Donald Trump specifically.
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts has thus far refused to allow the Court to step in, instead issuing public statements about “judicial independence,” seemingly siding with district court judges who have declared themselves the ultimate authority on everything from immigration enforcement to military readiness.
Attorney General Pam Bondi pulled no punches when she appeared on Fox News with Laura Ingraham to expose this judicial power grab.
“They are district judges trying to control our entire country — our entire country, and they’re trying to obstruct Donald Trump’s agenda,” Bondi added.
The Attorney General singled out several activist judges by name, including James Boasberg, Ana Reyes, and Beryl Howell, accusing them of abandoning impartiality in favor of partisan goals.
Judges making life-or-death decisions without accountability
One of the most alarming examples came when Judge James Boasberg ordered planes carrying deported gang members to turn around in midair, potentially creating a dangerous situation.
The planes were carrying members of violent gangs that President Trump had previously designated as foreign terrorist organizations under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act.
Boasberg made this reckless decision without even knowing if the aircraft had sufficient fuel to complete the revised flight plan, potentially endangering American lives.
Judge Ana Reyes similarly overstepped her authority by blocking an executive order on military personnel policy. Instead of ruling on legal grounds, her decision read more like a political manifesto supporting gender identity politics.
“Indeed, the cruel irony is that thousands of transgender servicemembers have sacrificed – some risking their lives – to ensure for others the very equal protection rights the Military Ban seeks to deny them,” Reyes’ ruling read.
Reyes’ ruling went on to say that the administration’s lawyers “have not shown they will be burdened by continuing the status quo pending this litigation, and avoiding constitutional violations is always in the public interest.”
Judge Beryl Howell, another Obama appointee, forced Twitter to hand over the contents of Trump’s social media account to Jack Smith, giving Democrat prosecutors access to information about Americans who interacted with Trump’s posts.
In a stunning conflict of interest, Howell is now overseeing a lawsuit filed by Perkins Coie, the very law firm that helped Hillary Clinton’s campaign fund the discredited Steele dossier.
A pattern of unchecked judicial activism
The Department of Justice has already requested Howell’s removal from cases involving the Trump administration due to her obvious bias, but the judicial system has circled the wagons to protect its own.
These activist judges have discovered a dangerous loophole in the legal system. By issuing their commands as “temporary restraining orders” rather than formal injunctions, they’ve made their decisions effectively unappealable.
This creates a situation where a single district court judge in Washington, D.C., can effectively overrule the President of the United States with no meaningful check on their power.
Congressman Brandon Gill (R-TX) has introduced articles of impeachment against Judge Boasberg, recognizing the constitutional crisis this judicial overreach has created.
“We will not stand by as radical activist Judge James Boasberg tramples on the Constitution out of political spite for the President. The American people gave us a mandate to get criminal illegal aliens out of our country, and that’s exactly what we intend to do,” Gill said in a statement regarding the impeachment effort.
Other Republican lawmakers are considering additional measures to rein in these rogue judges, including stripping certain courts of jurisdiction or cutting their funding.
The Trump administration isn’t taking this judicial assault lying down.
Attorney General Bondi expressed confidence that the Supreme Court will eventually step in to restore the proper balance of powers.
“You know, these judges are taking personal attacks to it, at many of the cabinet secretaries. And these judges across the country — and again, they think they have authority, but it’s going to be short-lived because these cases are going to get to the Supreme Court very fast. We’re doing everything we can,” Bondi told Ingraham.
Constitutional experts point out that the 1948 Supreme Court case Ludecke v. Watkins specifically upheld the President’s power to deport hostile aliens under the Alien Enemies Act — the very power Judge Boasberg attempted to override.
If left unchecked, these activist judges threaten to transform America from a constitutional republic into what Bondi described as a “judicial junta” — a government ruled by unelected judges answerable to no one.
For now, the fate of American democracy may rest with the Supreme Court, which has the power to restore the constitutional separation of powers and put these activist judges back in their place.
